Petty treason
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Petty treason or petit treason was an offence under the common law of England which involved the betrayal of a superior by a subordinate. It differed from the better-known high treason in that high treason can only be committed against the Sovereign. In England and Wales, petty treason ceased to be a distinct offence from murder by virtue of section 1 (repealing the previous statute) and section 2 (assimilating the offence to murder) of the Offences Against the Person Act 1828. It never existed in Scotland. It has also been abolished in other common-law countries.
The common law offence was codified in the Treason Act 1351. Under that Act, petty treason was an aggravated form of murder. It consisted of:
- a wife killing her husband,
- a clergyman killing his prelate, or
- a servant killing his master or mistress, or his master's wife.[1]
The Act abolished three other forms of petty treason which had existed under common law:
- a wife attempting to kill her husband,
- a servant forging his master's seal, or
- a servant committing adultery with his master's wife or daughter.
The element of betrayal is the reason why this crime was considered worse than an ordinary murder; medieval and post-medieval society rested on a framework in which each person had his or her appointed place and such murders were seen as threatening this framework. Many people had somebody subordinate to them and feared the consequences if the murder of superiors was not punished harshly.
The punishment for a man convicted of petty treason was to be drawn to the place of execution and hanged, but not quartered as in the case of high treason. However the punishment for a woman was to be burned at the stake, the same penalty as for high treason. In later years the law offered a modicum of mercy to women who were to be executed in this fashion: the executioner was equipped with a cord passed around the victim's throat and, standing outside of the fire, would pull it tight, strangling her before the flames could reach her. In a few instances however, this could go wrong, with the cord burning through and the victim burning alive; the ensuing scandals were part of what led to the abolition of this punishment and its substitution by hanging in 1790.
The common law defence of provocation, by which a verdict of murder could be reduced to manslaughter, was also available in petty treason trials.
Despite its name, petty treason was nevertheless considered to be a felony, and so the rules of evidence and procedure in petty treason trials were the same as in murder trials. Consequently the Treason Act 1695 did not apply to petty treason. Petty treason also differed from high treason in that the legal defence of benefit of clergy was available for petty treason until 1532,[2] whereas it was never available for high treason.
[edit] References
- Hale's History of Pleas of the Crown (1800 ed.) vol. 1, chapter XXIX (from Google Books).
- Hawkin's Treatise of Pleas of the Crown (1824 ed.) vol.1, chapter XIV (from Google Books).
- East's Treatise of Pleas of the Crown (1806 Ed) vol.1, Chapter V, Part VII (sections 98 to 104) (pp 336 - 339) (from Google Books).
- Coke's Institutes (1797 Ed.), Part 3, Chapter 2 (pp 19 to 36) (from Google Books).
- Chitty's Practical Treatise on Criminal Law (1819 Ed.), vol.3, paragraphs 742 to 745 (pp 176 to 179) (preliminary notes) [1] and paragraphs 779 to 781 (pp 211 - 214) (specimen indictments) [2] (from Google Books).
- Blackstone's Commentaries (1867 ed.), Book 4, Chapter 14, paragraphs 203 and 204 (See also 1791 ed. pages 202 to 204 [3] and the 1825 ed. [4] - the commentary in footnotes differs) (from Google Books).
- J.G. Bellamy, The Law of Treason in England in the Later Middle Ages, CUP, (2004 ed.), Appendix II [5] (from Google Books).
