Welcome to uiboss.com on July 11 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Talk:History of East Asia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject China     (Rated Stub-Class)
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Chinese history workgroup.
WikiProject History (Rated Stub-Class)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it.

Contents

[edit] Attempt to grow this article

Hi. I know this is probably a difficult area of history to cover, since there is so much separate history for each east asian nation... But I think it would be helpful to readers to be able to piece together any kind of broad trends.

I've started by listing a bunch of wars. Already, you can see that the Mongol invasions are of huge regional importance.

I know this will never have a history as fluid or shared as the history of Europe, but my hope is that this comes even half way. I can already think of a few cultural events of regional importance:

Let's work together and do our best to make this a reality!

69.158.140.52 00:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

  • This article is in very bad shape; the present organization of sections is very confusing; why does the religion come before general history? Why isn't religion part of the general history sections by time frame? Why is there an entire section on gunpowder? Not to say gunpowder shouldn't be mentioned and linked, but the main focus of this article shouldn't be on arsenal and firearms (afterall, this is not a military history article, but a general history of East Asia). Besides the obvious need for expansion in sections such as "1945 to present," this article needs some serious reorganizing. I might be up to the challenge, since I own books on general East Asian history.--Pericles of AthensTalk 18:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vietnam

Since this page is a listing of countries as a part of East Asia and although Vietnam might not be geographically part of East Asia, if you refer to East Asia it does include Vietnam as a part of cultural East Asia. Also, Vietnam (Annam) was subject to invasion from the Chinese and parts of Vietnams culture is adapted from Chinese traditions, like their zodiac, capital city, and language. I would argue that Vietnam should be on this list. Tortfeasor 22:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree we can list Vietnam both in East Asia and Southeast Asia on many topics, just for reference purpose.

User:163.28.64.50


I agree that Vietnam should be on the list. If you can put part of Russia, (which is northeast Asia) on that list, Vietnam should be there too. The history of Vietnam is strongly linked with the other east asian nations, especially china. User: Tridungvo


[edit] References

The reference section is bad, with most of the ones cited having no more than a name and a date, which may be known to those already familiar with the literature, but for a beginner (like me) what's given is pretty much useless. They should definitely be expanded.

[edit] Restructuring

Does everyone agree that this page needs to be improved? I'm thinking about completely restructuring the article, because it is not nearly as organized as, for example, History of Europe and History of North America. Also, there is not much information here, and much of it doesn't fit very well. A whole section on the stirrup? If anyone has any objections, please let me know. Thanks! KingOfFruit (talk) 17:27, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs