From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale. |
| This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it. |
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
|
 Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
[edit] "Concern" a synonym?
Is "concern" a synonym for "holding compary"? --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] US focus
I don't think that there are necessarily the same legal concept in other countries. Removal of the tag is probably warranted. If noone objects, I will remove it in two weeks.Racepacket (talk) 13:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- It's a common term in the UK, and the concept clearly exists elsewhere. Globalisation of the article seems entirely appropriate to me. If this article were on US law on holding companies (which I'm sure is distinct from whatever law there is elsewhere) I could see your point, but the title is suggestive of something broader, and there's not so much content here that a split seems indicated at this point. Alai (talk) 01:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
