Welcome to uiboss.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Talk:Siege of Petropavlovsk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Russia (Rated Start-Class, Low-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Military history WikiProject     (Rated Start-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] Source of reference

It seems this article is full of conjectures; reference and sources must be given, so that article can be validated. The fact that exactly 500 Brits and French died and exactly 100 Russians died is just obscene and least believable casualty report ever.Mic of orion (talk) 18:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

What's wrong with the sources given in the References section? From what I see, there's plenty to go on with verifying any statement this article makes. As for the casualty report, I don't believe the numbers were intended to be exact; looks like they've been rounded to a nearest hundred.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


Makes me think, what else is made up or rounded up in this made to believe article, sorry, but I find Russian information sources to be lead by ideology and not reality, if this article is to be believed it must have independent sourced and in English so that it can be verified by everyone who visit this page. Mic of orion (talk) 16:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Sources are sources are sources. As long as a source is considered reliable (by Wikipedia standards, not by your perceptions), it can be used, regardless of what language it is in. The sources used in this article are definitely reliable (albeit not necessarily sufficient). Also, if you do happen to have sources in a language other than Russian, by all means feel free add them, the article will only get better for it.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 23:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Allies

Commanded by Rear Admiral David Price

[edit] United Kingdom

[edit] France

Commanded by Rear-Admiral Fevrier-Despointes:

  • Forte (60) (flag)
  • Eurydice (22) - Captains de La Grandiere
  • Obligado (18)

[edit] Russia

Commanded by Rear-Admiral Poutiatin:

  • Aurora (44) (frigate)
  • Dvina (12) (transport)

[edit] 31-30 = 1

The article stated that the Allies broke off bombardment on 30 Aug, but returned "within two days on 31 Aug." "Within two days" in that case is redundant, if not contradictory, so I took the liberty of removing the phrase. If that constitutes "independent research," then I can cite Prof. Stephen Haycox, "Alaska," p.137, who says the bombardment took place on two consecutive days.

Terry J. Carter (talk) 23:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs