From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Universities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of universities and colleges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
C |
This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it. |
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
C |
This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
| This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it. |
|
|
[edit] Secession
I eliminated a factually inaccurate claim that Lincoln disbanded the Maryland legislature. In fact, Governor Hicks originally refused to even call the legislature into session in order to avoid a debate on secession. Later the legislature met and did not propose secession. The arrest of some legislators came after this meeting and the decision was originally made by military leaders, not Lincoln. In any event, it does not seem appropriate to discuss the various political and military machinations that went on in Maryland in this particular article. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] GA Reassessment
- This discussion is transcluded from Talk:United States Naval Academy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
This article needs some improvements for it to keep its good article status.
- Several sections and paragraphs are uncited, including:
- Most of the paragraphs in "Description"
- Several paragraphs in "History"
- "Campus (The Yard)" is unreferenced
- Most of "Halls and principal buildings" also
- All of "Faculty"
- And so on.
Please keep this page updated with the article's status, thanks. Gary King (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
- No improvements made since this review began, so it is being delisted. Gary King (talk) 21:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Green Bowlers
There was a report in 1942, that a tiny group of USNA alumni (from 1907 or thereabouts) had banded together to form a secret clique to ensure that they each made admiral. It was called "The Green Bowlers" and apparently received quite a bit of publicity. See Time letter for one. Probably other refs out there.
Anyway, inspired by this piece of information an entire class of then-brand new grads (1945 I think) decided that they were going to be the "Green Bowlers" (the identity of the others being credibly secret!) and showed up for alumni meetings in, appropriately, and anything-but-discrete, bright-green bowlers! The idea was quite funny at the time. Don't know where mention would go. The first "real" group, which encountered extreme suspicion and publicity, should go somewhere. The second is more for fun than anything else.Student7 (talk) 23:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Shoeless graduation
A "prank" that might be mentioned is the class of 1952 who stepped out of their shoes when parading for the final time. See description which sounds worse than what I had heard. That wouldn't even be tried today, I don't think. Whatever possessed them? :) This is a good ref BTW which could be used for contructing a sentence someplace. Student7 (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Citations needed
Following up on the GA review comments, this article is missing enough citations it doesn't qualify for Milhist B-class. I added some citations on the Midshipman article which might be helpful. Kirk (talk) 20:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)