User talk:Jayjg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 6 days are automatically archived. |
| Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please: *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
 Archives |
|---|
 |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
[edit] Courtesy FYI
As a courtesy, you are notified of this, with which you may be involved. CasualObserver'48 (talk) 07:36, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] ArbCom
Hi Jayjg,
I have just discovered that the current Arbcom has decided to make you resign from different functions. This decision is unfair and unjustified. These people don't have any idea of the situation in all these articles. Good continuation. Sorry for our disagreements and thank for your support. Ceedjee (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- It appears that Jayjg has not been here for a month. Considering the treatment he has gotten, that is no surprise. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 18:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] RFAR/West Bank - Judea and Samaria
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Canadian Monkey (talk · contribs), G-Dett (talk · contribs), MeteorMaker (talk · contribs), Nickhh (talk · contribs), Nishidani (talk · contribs), NoCal100 (talk · contribs), and Pedrito (talk · contribs) are prohibited from editing any Arab-Israeli conflict-related article/talk page or discussing on the dispute anywhere else on the project. Jayjg (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · moves · rights) is also prohibited from editing in the area of conflict, and he is stripped of his status as a functionary and any and all associated privileged access, including the CheckUser and Oversight tools and the checkuser-l, oversight-l, and functionaries-en mailing lists. Jayjg is also thanked for his years of service.
After six months, these editors may individually ask the Arbitration Committee to lift their editing restrictions after demonstrating commitment to the goals of Wikipedia and ability to work constructively with other editors. However, restrictions may be temporarily suspended for the exclusive purpose of participating in the discussion of draft guidelines for this area.
In the meantime, the community is strongly urged to pursue current discussions to come to a definitive consensus on the preferred current and historical names of the region that is the source of conflict in this case. Note that this must be consistent with current Wikipedia guidelines on reliable sources, a neutral point of view, and naming conventions. This decision will be appended onto this case within two months from the close of the case.
For the Arbitration Committee, hmwithτ 17:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Checkuser and Oversight access
Dear user, I've removed your Checkuser and Oversight access as per signed request and ArbCom ruling. I hope that you will accept my "thank you" for your efforts in those areas and my best wishes for your continuing collaboration on any Wikimedia project.
[edit] Well-wishes
Jayjg has not been around in over a month. I hope he does not return any time to soon, just to see how he has been unfairly treated by the Arbitration Committee. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 17:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to hear about all this unpleasantness, Jayjg. I hope you return; until then, you are missed. Sic transit gloria wiki. – Quadell (talk) 19:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Jayjg. Unlike other editors, I do not think the arbitration committee’s decision is much of a tragedy for you. According to my impression, your main purpose in editing the wikipedia has always been to write good and professional articles and not to promote some ideology. This is evident from your extensive high quality contributions over the years. Please continue to contribute and thank you for all the hard work you have put into this encyclopedia. Best Tkalisky (talk) 04:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Jay. I wrote what I thought of the decision on Nishidani's talk page. BTW, when you return I hope you'll take a look at the nice things he said about you there.John Z (talk) 06:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Hard to know what to say. I'm sorry things worked out the way they did. I hope to see you around the wiki. All the best. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 23:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Jayjg is one of the finest, most respectful, and most objective editors on Wikipedia. This was an unfair decision.Historicist (talk) 19:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Damn straight it was. Wikifan12345 (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
I check from time to time to see if you are editing again. I do hope that you will. It is a great pity that bullying and injustice chases reliable editors away from Wikipedia.Historicist (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
The rain it raineth on the just And also on the unjust fella; But chiefly on the just, because The unjust steals the just's umbrella.' - Lord BowenHistoricist (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Merge
I've just proposed merging Unification Church and antisemitism (which you worked on) into Divine Principle. Please join in the discussion, if you like. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
